Home | Background | Purchasing Tool | Case Studies | Links | Site Map

Terminology. The term "dioxin" or "furan" technically refers to the basic structure of the molecule, which is composed of carbon and oxygen. Through reactions involving halogens, such as chlorine or bromine, dioxins and furans acquire toxic properties. Almost all research on halogenated dioxins and furans has focused on chlorinated species—polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs). There are 75 different PCDDs and 135 different PCDFs. Each compound has a distinct number and configuration of chlorine atoms. These differences in chemical structure produce varying levels of toxicity among the PCDD/F family. Although it is technically inaccurate, PCDD/Fs are frequently referred to as dioxins. To minimize confusion, the authors will use the most specific notation available in the literature. The general terms "dioxins" and "dioxin" are assumed to refer collectively to PCDD/Fs.

Sources. PCDD/Fs have no intentional use. They are produced as byproducts of municipal waste combustion, residential coal combustion, secondary aluminum smelting, open barrel burning, and medical waste incineration (1, 2, 3). Recent mass balance analysis suggests that atmospheric formation is also a significant source of PCDD/F deposition (4). However, the researchers note that this mechanism creates congeners with low toxicity, creating little additional risk for people and the environment. The U.S. EPA, in a 1994 draft document, estimated that although only 30 pounds of dioxins are emitted annually, everyone has been exposed to them (5). Other sources suggest that the emission rate is almost 900 pounds per year (6). In 1998, the EPA released its assessment of PCDD/F sources in the United States. According to this report, medical waste incineration is the third largest source of PCDD/Fs (7). Table 1 summarizes the contributions of the top sources.

Source
% of Total Emissions
Municipal solid waste incineration
38
Secondary copper smelting
19
Medical waste incineration
17
Forest, brush, and straw fires
7
Municipal wastewater sludge
7
Other sources
12
Table 1: PCDD/F emissions in the United states (I-TEQ/yr).
[Percentages derived from Cleverly et al, 1999.]

Pathways and Exposure. Dioxins degrade very slowly, having an estimated half-life in humans ranging from 7.5 years (1) to 10 years (5). PCDD/Fs are released into the atmosphere, typically attached to particulate matter (2). They redeposit on the land and settle onto plants and soil. When animals ingest plant matter that has dioxin residuals on them, the dioxins bioaccumulate in the animal fat (8). Dioxins are also deposited on bodies of water and then ingested by aquatic organisms, which are in turn eaten by humans. The dioxins are deposited in fatty tissues and bioaccumulate up the food chain. The main route of human exposure is ingestion through fish, meat, and dairy products (1). The most toxic of the PCDD/F group is 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, or TCDD. The health effects of TCDD have been scrutinized in animal and epidemiological studies since the 1970s.


Animal studies. Earlier animal studies focused on toxicity and carcinogenicity. Toxicological studies in animals have demonstrated carcinogenicity of TCDD in rats, mice, and hamsters. These cancers affected the liver, skin, lung, thyroid, tongue, and hard palate (9).

Recent research has investigated the effects that TCDD may have on the endocrine and immune systems. Studies using significantly lower doses than administered in earlier studies indicate that TCDD has the most profound, long-lasting effect on rats exposed to the substance prenatally. These effects can be seen even at sub-toxic levels. Endocrine system effects include decreased testosterone levels, lowered sperm production, delayed or decreased development of accessory sexual organs, and feminized adult sexual behavior in male offspring exposed prenatally to TCDD (10). Immune system effects include suppression of fetal thymocyte differentiation in mice (11) and inhibition of B cell maturation (12, 13). Some researchers speculate that endometriosis in humans may originate in an altered immune response caused by TCDD (14).


Human studies. Epidemiological studies have focused on the results of occupational and other accidental exposures, mostly focusing on the mortality rate from cancer. Several studies have noted an increased incidence of soft-tissue sarcoma in workers exposed to TCDD through exposure to synthetic chemicals (9, 15, 16). Other studies suggest a potential TCDD link to lymphomas (17) and nasal and nasopharyngeal cancer (18).

To assess the link between TCDD exposure and human cancer risk, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) undertook a comprehensive analysis of scientific literature on dioxins and furans. Evidence amassed in the IARC study suggests that TCDD acts as a promoter, not as a direct cancer-causing agent. TCDD evidently binds to the Ah receptor in the cell and alters the expression of genes involved in cell growth and differentiation. This mechanism is similar in humans and in experimental animals. Comparable TCDD tissue concentrations were found in the human cohorts who exhibited an increased incidence of cancer and in rats exposed to carcinogenic doses of TCDD. The IARC’s overall evaluation of TCDD was that it is "carcinogenic to humans." The other dioxin compounds were evaluated as "not classifiable as to their carcinogenicity to humans" (1). A subsequent study of the human cohort examined by IARC found statistically significant positive correlations between TCDD exposure and cancer, but only for those workers whose exposure was 100-1000 times greater than that of the general public (19). In June 2000, the U.S. EPA released a draft report reassessing the human health risks posed by dioxin exposure. In response to new evidence, the report included cancer risk estimates that are as much as ten times higher than previous estimates (20).


Consensus in the literature. In contrast to the example of mercury, there is considerable lack of consensus about the severity of health risks associated with dioxin exposure. The first major argument is actual human exposure level. The average TCDD level in human fatty tissue has decreased sharply in the past 20 years (1). Concern over dioxin exposure remains because of more subtle threats to human health than cancer or death. In light of the new evidence that extremely low levels of dioxins can alter the development of fetuses, even this minute concentration may be undesirable.

A second argument revolves around the link between incineration of halogenated plastics and formation of dioxins. The available scientific literature on this topic contains conflicting evidence that a causal relationship exists. Yet it is evident that, since halogens are an essential component of dioxins, some type of halogen (for example, chlorine) must be present in the waste stream to form dioxins.

Healthcare Waste Incineration and Dioxin Production
Use of halogenated plastics in healthcare. Healthcare waste has a distinct material composition that may create significant environmental concerns. Healthcare wastes are known to contain a greater concentration of plastics. Studies that have focused on distinctive departments within healthcare facilities have supported this finding (21, 22). Plastics comprise about 15 percent of healthcare wastes (23). In contrast, the total plastics content of municipal solid waste, before recycling, is only 9 percent (24). This prevalence of plastics in healthcare waste is due to the preference for single-use, disposable products to minimize the possibility of infection.

The most prevalent halogenated plastic in healthcare waste is polyvinyl chloride. Commonly known as PVC or vinyl, this plastic has been in use for over forty years. The versatility of this plastic has led it to be found in as many as 25 percent of all healthcare products (25). Many medical products, including blood and IV bags, dialysis tubing, catheters and inhalation masks, contain PVC (26). Note that PVC is not the dominant plastic used in healthcare facilities. In some cases, the dominant plastic is LDPE, HDPE, PS, or PP. Table 2 lists common applications of various plastics in healthcare. PVC, which is about fifty percent chlorine by weight, is a significant source of chlorine in medical waste streams (6).

Plastic Type
Use
#1 (PET) polyethylene terephthalate
Packaging
#2 (HDPE) high density polyethylene
Products, containers, basins, bowls
#3 (PVC) polyvinyl chloride
IV bags, blood bags, IV tubing, respiratory tubing, fluid collection devices, patient ID cards
#4 (LDPE) low density polyethylene
Films, feeding bags
#5 (PP) polypropylene
Containers, surgical wrappers, basins
#6 (PS) polystyrene
Food service ware, packaging, cartridges
#7 Mixed plastics
Packaging, containers
Table 2: Types and uses of plastics in healthcare products.

Incineration of PVC and formation of dioxins. The dioxin emissions from medical waste incinerators may be as high as twice the emissions from municipal solid waste incinerators (6). Results of a recent lab-scale reactor study showed that combustion of chlorinated materials produced about ten times more dioxins than combustion of non-chlorinated materials (27). An extensive review of dioxin emission data suggests a causal relationship between the amount of chlorine in an incinerated waste stream and the emissions of dioxins (6).

Most of the relevant experiments have burned municipal solid waste to determine the connection between PVC input and dioxin output; relatively few studies have focused on medical waste incinerators. Some investigators have concluded that the combustion of PVC does not create significant amounts of PCDD/Fs. One well-publicized study found no relationship between chlorine input and dioxin output (28). However, this experiment only measured gas-phase dioxins. Other studies have found that the addition of PVC to municipal waste did not increase PCDD/F emissions upon incineration (29, 30, 31). The combustion formation of halogenated organic compounds like PCDD/Fs is very complex. The following laboratory results, taken together, create a plausible mechanism for PCDD/F formation from PVC combustion.

At temperatures above 300 oC, incineration of PVC leads to production of hydrogen chloride gas (HCl) and chlorobenzene (32). Sufficient evidence exists that chlorinated compounds such as chlorobenzenes and chlorophenols act as precursors, or key intermediates, to PCDD/F formation (33, 34, 35). Combusting PVC with phenol resin at 600 oC in the presence of HCl results in a dramatic increase in PCDD/F production (36). Several studies indicated that there is an exponential relationship between HCl injection and PCDD/F production from hydrocarbon combustion (37, 38).

A wide range of substances can affect the PCDD/F formation reaction. Besides PVC, inorganic chlorine compounds such as HCl, Cl2, KCl, NaCl, CuCl, CuCl2, and FeCl3 can act as source of chlorine (39). Copper compounds are noted as important catalysts for PCDD/F formation (33, 39, 40). The formation of PCDD/F may be inhibited by the absence of oxygen (37, 39). Sulfur has been noted as both an inhibitor (41, 42) and a catalyst (33).

The available literature suggests that the optimal temperature for PCDD/F formation is 250-400 oC (33, 39, 43). While PCDD/F can be destroyed at temperatures above 900 oC, these compounds can also be formed in the postcombustion zone of incinerators, where temperatures are lower. Cooling of the exhaust gases is necessary before entry into pollution control devices, particularly fabric filters. It has been noted that high temperature combustion promotes the formation of PCDD/F precursors such as chlorophenols (33)

Effects of pollution control devices. It is conceivable that when fly ash is captured in devices such as baghouses or electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), conditions favor PCDD/F formation. At low temperatures, carbon structures in fly ash can be broken down, coupled into non-chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and –furans, and chlorinated to form PCDD/Fs (44). This theory is supported by the results of one experiment in which the levels of PCDD/F in fly ash were higher after the baghouse filter than before it. Although overall particle filtration efficiency was greater than 99 percent, PCDD/F particulate removal efficiency was only 50 percent (33). Another study of a full-scale municipal waste combustor exhibited dramatic increases in total PCDD/Fs after the ESPs, supporting the hypothesis of PCDD/F formation in pollution control equipment (45). Recently obtained evidence suggests that substances in the fly ash produced in the incineration process may catalyze dioxin-producing reactions (27).

Some evidence exists that granular activated carbon (GAC) can capture significant amounts of dioxins and furans from the flue gas stream (46). When the GAC supply is exhausted, however, it must be replaced. This creates a solid waste disposal problem that may add to the already high cost of operating a GAC pollution control device. One company has recently developed special catalytic baghouse filters that convert dioxins and furans to water, carbon dioxide, and hydrochloric acid (47). However, hydrochloric acid is a known respiratory and sensory irritant (32).

Healthcare facilities whose medical waste incinerators are equipped with pollution control equipment report significant volumes of ash and lime waste from the equipment that need to be disposed of as solid wastes. At one facility, this waste amounts to more than 400,000 pounds per year. Even though the facility has reduced red bag waste volumes and increased recycling waste volumes, reducing overall actual waste volumes, they have seen a sharp increase in waste going to the landfill. The ash residuals and pollution control device wastes account for that increase (48).

Although as many as 80 percent of on-site medical waste incinerators are predicted to close down due to stricter emissions regulations (49), alternative treatment schemes may be equally problematic. In a situation where medical waste is sterilized and sent to a municipal waste incinerator, problematic materials such as mercury and halogenated plastics remain in the waste. Infectious potential of the waste stream is reduced, but the potential for mercury and dioxin emissions remains.

Even if incinerators are operated at ideal conditions, the potential for dioxin formation may remain, and the amount of pollutants removed must eventually be disposed of. The theory of post combustion PCDD/F formation suggests that the reactions occur on fly ash particles collected in pollution control devices such as fabric filters and ESPs. If this theory holds true, many pollution control devices currently in use are unable to remove significant amounts of PCDD/Fs from the fly ash since the ash collection method encourages PCDD/F formation.


References

  1. IARC. Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum 69 (1997).
  2. U.S. EPA. Locating and Estimating Air Emissions from Sources of Dioxins and Furans. EPA-454/R-97-003. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 1997.
  3. Lemieux PM, Lutes CC, Abbott JA, Aldous KM. Emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans from the open burning of household waste in barrels. Envir Sci & Tech 34(3): 377-384 (2000).
  4. Baker JI, Hites RA. Is combustion the major source of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans to the environment? A mass balance investigation. Envir Sci & Tech 34(14): 2879-2886 (2000).
  5. Baker B. The dioxin dilemma remains inresolved. Bioscience 44: 738-739 (1994).
  6. Thomas VM, Spiro TG. An estimation of dioxin emissions in the United States. Toxicol Environ Chem 50: 1-37 (1995).
  7. Cleverly D, Schaum J, Winters D, Schweer G. Inventory of sources and releases of dioxin-like compounds in the United States. In: Proceedings of 19th International Symposium on Halogenated Environmental Organic Pollutants and POPs, 12-17 September 1999, Venice, Italy. CD-ROM.
  8. Commoner B, Richardson J, Cohen M, Flack S, Bartlett PW, Cooney P, Couchot K, Eisl H, Hill C. Dioxin Sources, Air Transport and Contamination in Dairy Feed Crops and Milk. Flushing, NY: Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Queens College, 1998.
  9. Fingerhut MA, Halperin WE, Marlow DA, Piacitelli LA, Honchar PA, Sweeney MH, Greife AL, Dill PA, Steenland K, Suruda AJ. Cancer mortality in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. N Engl J Med 324(4): 212-218 (1991).
  10. Mably TA, Moore RW, Peterson RE. In utero and lactational exposure of male rats to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 114: 97-107 (1992).
  11. Blaylock BL, Holladay SD, Comment CE, Heindel JJ, Luster MI. Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) alters fetal thymocyte maturation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 112: 207-213 (1992).
  12. Tucker AN, Vore SJ, Luster MI. Suppression of B cell differentiation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Mol Pharmacol 29: 372-377 (1986).
  13. House RV, Lauer LD, Murray MJ, Thomas PT, Ehrlich JP, Burleson GR, Dean JH. Examination of immune parameters and host resistance mechanisms in B6C3F1 mice following adult exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Toxicol Environ Health 31: 203-215 (1990).
  14. Cummings AM, Metcalf JL, Birnbaum L. Promotion of endometriosis by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rats and mice: time-dose dependence and species comparison. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 138: 131-139 (1996).
  15. Ericksson M, Hardell L, Berg NO, Moller T, Axelson O. Soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to chemical substances: a case-referent study. Br J Ind Med 38: 27-33 (1981).
  16. Hardell L, Sandstrom A. Case-control study: soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids or chlorophenols. Br J Cancer 39: 711-717 (1979).
  17. Hardell L, Eriksson M, Lenner P, Lundgren E. Malignant lymphoma and exposure to chemicals, especially organic solvents, chlorophenols and phenoxy acids: a case-control study. Br J Cancer 43: 169-176 (1981).
  18. Hardell L, Johansson B, Alexson O. Epidemiological study of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancer and their relation to phenoxy acid or chlorophenol exposure. Am J Ind Med 3: 247-257 (1982).
  19. Steenland K, Piacitelli L, Deddens J, Fingerhut M, Chang LI. Cancer, heart disease, and diabetes in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(9): 779-786 (1999).
  20. Skrzycki C, Warrick J. EPA links dioxin to cancer; risk estimate raised tenfold. Washington Post May 17: A01 (2000).
  21. Tieszen ME, Gruenberg ME. A quantitative, qualitative, and critical assessment of surgical waste. JAMA 267(20): 2765-2768 (1992).
  22. Leach C, Shaner H. MedCycle offers opportunities for nurses as front-line recyclers. Regulatory Analyst November: 6-11 (1992).
  23. Fenwick RC. American Hospital Association conference on hospitals and the environment. May 1991.
  24. U.S. EPA. Municipal Solid Waste Factbook. Available: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/factbook/internet/mswf/gen.htm#4 [cited 27 July 2000].
  25. Vinyl Institute. Vinyl in Medical Applications. Available: http://www.vinylinfo.org/infiniteuses/medical/med_applications.html [cited 27 July 2000].
  26. Vinyl Institute. Medical. Available: http://vinylinfo.org/infiniteuses/medical/medical.html [cited 27 July 2000].
  27. Takasuga T, Makino T, Tsubota K, Takeda N. Formation of dioxins (PCDDs/PCDFs) by dioxin-free fly ash as a catalyst and relation with several chlorine-sources. Chemosphere 40: 1003-1007 (2000).
  28. Rigo HG, Chandler AJ, Lanier WS. The Relationship Between Chlorine in Waste Streams and Dioxin Emissions from Waste Combustor Stacks. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1995.
  29. Carroll WF. PVC and incineration. J Vinyl Technology 10(2): 90-94 (1988).
  30. Giugliano M, Cernuschi S, Ghezzi U. The emission of dioxins and related compounds from the incineration of municipal solid wastes with high contents of organic chlorine (PVC). Chemosphere 19: 407-411 (1989).
  31. Lenoir D, Kaune A, Hutzinger O, Mutzenich G, Horch K. Influence of operating parameters and fuel type on PCDD/F emissions from a fluidized bed incinerator. Chemosphere 23: 1491-1500 (1991).
  32. Huggett C, Levin BC. Toxicity of the pyrolysis and combustion products of poly(vinyl chlorides): a literature assessment. Fire and Materials 11: 131-142 (1987).
  33. Halonen I, Tarhanen J, Kopsa T, Palonen J, Vilokki H, Ruuskanen J. Formation of polychlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans in incineration of refuse derived fuel and biosludge. Chemosphere 26: 1869-1880 (1993).
  34. Kaune A, Lenoir D, Schramm KW, Zimmermann R, Kettrup A, Jaeger K, Ruckel HG, Frank F. Chlorobenzenes and chlorophenols as indicator parameters for chlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans in incineration processes: influences of various facilities and sampling points. Environ Engineer Sci 15(1): 85-95 (1998).
  35. Kanters J, Louw R. Chlorine input and output in combustion of municipal solid waste in a lab-scale mini-reactor system. Chemosphere 29:1919-1925 (1994).
  36. Wirts M, Lorenz W, Bahadir M. Does co-combustion of PVC and other plastics lead to enhanced formation of PCDD/F? Chemosphere 37(8): 1489-1500 (1998).
  37. De Fre R, Rymen T. PCDD and PCDF formation from hydrocarbon combustion in the presence of hydrogen chloride. Chemosphere 19: 331-336 (1989).
  38. Wikstrom E, Lofvenius G, Rappe C, Marklund S. Influence of level and form of chlorine on the formation of chlorinated dioxins, dibenzofurans, and benzenes during combustion of an artificial fuel in a laboratory reactor. Environ Sci Tech 30(5): 1637-1644 (1996).
  39. Addink R, Olie K. Mechanisms of formation and destruction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in heterogeneous systems. Environ Sci Tech 29(6): 1425-1435 (1995).
  40. Lenoir D, Wehrmeier A, Schramm KW, Kaune A, Zimmermann R, Taylor PH, Sidhu SS. Thermal formation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and –furans: investigations on relevant pathways. Environ Engineer Sci 15(1): 37-47 (1998).
  41. Raghunathan K. Role of sulfur in reducing PCDD and PCDF formation. Environ Sci Tech 30(6): 1827-1834 (1996).
  42. Ruokojarvi P, Halonen I, Tuppurainen K, Tarhanen J, Ruuskanen J. Effect of gaseous inhibitors on PCDD/F formation. Environ Sci Tech 32: 3099-3103 (1998).
  43. Dickson LC, Lenoir D, Hutzinger O. Quantitative comparison of de novo and precursor formation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins under simulated municipal solid waste incinerator postcombustion conditions. Environ Sci Tech 26: 1822-1828 (1992).
  44. Huang H, Buekens A. De novo synthesis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans: proposal of a mechanistic scheme. Sci Total Environ 193: 121-141 (1996).
  45. Mariani G, Benfenati E, Fanelli R. Concentrations of PCDD and PCDF in different points of a modern refuse incinerator. Chemosphere 21: 507-517 (1990).
  46. Ruegg H, Sigg A. Dioxin removal in a wet scrubber and dry particulate remover. Chemosphere 25: 143-148 (1992).
  47. W. L. Gore and Associates. REMEDIA D/F Catalytic Filter System – Overview. Available: http://www.gore.com/remedia/prod_info.html [cited 27 July 2000].
  48. Tucker J. Personal communication.
  49. Malloy, MG. Medical waste comes of age. Available: http://www.wasteage.com/wa/archive/1997/7medwast.html [cited 27 July 2000].
Welcome to Adobe GoLive 4